The Cruelty is the Point

The Deaths of Daphy Michel and Nurul Amin Shah Alam

There are tragedies that feel random. And then there are tragedies that look unmistakably like policy, especially in the Trump Regime 2.0. The deaths of Daphy Michel and Nurul Amin Shah Alam fall squarely into the latter category.

Different cities. Different nationalities. Different detention circumstances. But the same government led by Convicted Felon Donald Trump and operated by his maliciously incompetent minions. And the same outcome: a vulnerable immigrant leaves U.S. custody — and ends up dead days later.

If this were a single isolated incident, the government could plausibly call it an unfortunate accident. But when the conduct becomes a distinct, repeating pattern, it stops looking like tragedy and starts looking like systemic negligence. And the agency at the center of that negligence is U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

DAPHY MICHEL

Daphy Michel came to the United States seeking protection. A Haitian national, she entered the country legally on December 14, 2022, and was paroled into the U.S. for humanitarian reasons. She later applied for asylum and eventually settled in Washington County, Pennsylvania, while awaiting her immigration proceedings.

In September of 2025, Daphy experienced a mental health crisis that led to her being arrested and charged with misdemeanors for harassment and terroristic threats. She spent roughly six months in the county jail awaiting a mental health evaluation while her preliminary hearing was repeatedly postponed seven times.

Ultimately, the criminal charges against Daphy were dismissed on February 26, 2026. Her brother expected her to be released from the jail that day or the next. However, instead of walking out of the jail, she was handed over to ICE because of an immigration detainer.

On February 27th, ICE agents transported Daphy more than one hour north to Pittsburgh, where was taken to ICE’s enforcement office in that city. ICE placed her in the Intensive Supervision Appearance Program, fitted her with a GPS ankle monitor, and then released her into the community. Media reports she may have been released near a bus stop in Pittsburgh, but no one knows. The one thing that is certain, though, is that her family was never notified of the exact location or the fact her release even occurred.

Five days later, on March 2nd, Daphy Michel was found lying unresponsive at a bus shelter at 10 a.m. in the morning. Emergency personnel responded and found her with no pulse and not breathing. They attempted CPR and administered Narcan before transporting her to the local hospital. She died shortly afterward.

On March 3, while the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office had custody of Daphy’s body, ICE received a “strap tamper alert” from her GPS ankle monitor. Why? Because the ME removed it during the postmortem process. The ME’s office has opened an investigation into Daphy’s death and the results are still pending.

Her poor brother learned of her death from hospital staff; not from ICE. And to this day, the federal government has not publicly explained the most basic facts about his sister’s final days. Where was Daphy released? When exactly was she released? Why was she released alone in a city far from her family? And how did a woman under federal supervision end up dead at a bus stop five days later?

Sidenote: I’m often asked where I go to do research for my reporting. One of the main research tools I use is called Ground News. Ground News shows me how stories are being covered from different political perspectives, and it highlights “blindspots” where only left-wing or right-wing media is covering a story.

Ground News has been a great sponsor of my YouTube channel, and they’re now sponsoring this post as well. I worked out a deal with them: if you go to ground.news/phang, you can get 40% off Ground News’ top-tier Vantage plan, which gives you unlimited access to all the research tools I use.

Ground News is subscriber-funded, so they don’t rely on ads that could introduce bias. By subscribing, you support both our channel and their independent team working to keep the media transparent.

Now back to where I left off.

NURUL AMIN SHAH ALAM

If Daphy’s story sounds shocking, it shouldn’t be because we’ve already seen this before. Nurul Amin Shah Alam was a Rohingya refugee from Myanmar who had fled with his family from brutal persecution and genocide. He was nearly blind and spoke little to no English.

After spending months in custody in Buffalo for a pending criminal case, local authorities eventually released him. But not to his family, who was waiting for him in the Waiting Area at the local jail where he was being held. Instead, Buffalo police released Nurul to U.S. Border Patrol because of an immigration detainer, just like the one Daphy Michel had.

But, after federal agents determined Nurul wasn’t eligible for deportation, they didn’t notify his family. Instead, these Border Patrol agents drove him to a Tim Hortons coffee shop in Buffalo. And they dropped him off. In the middle of winter, at 8:18 pm ET at night wearing the orange paper booties given to him at the jail. The inside of the coffee shop was closed. The agents just left him there.

Five days later, Nurul was found dead on a street near downtown Buffalo. SEVERAL MILES away from that Tim Horton’s. Buffalo’s mayor called the decision to release him in that way a “dereliction of duty.” That phrase may actually be too charitable. Because this was not just negligence. It was predictable harm.

I covered Nurul’s story in detail on my YouTube channel (Katie Phang News), because when I heard about it, I was beyond outraged:

This is not just about morality. It’s about the law. When the government takes someone into custody — whether criminal or civil — it assumes a duty of care. The reason is simple: the government has taken control over that person’s liberty and ability to care for themselves.

Courts have repeatedly recognized that immigration detainees depend entirely on the government for their safety and medical well-being. That duty does not magically disappear the moment the government decides to release someone into the community. If authorities know that a detainee is vulnerable, either medically, physically, or psychologically, they cannot simply open the door and walk away. And yet that appears to be exactly what happened in both of these cases.

Daphy had documented mental health concerns. Nurul was nearly blind and needed walking assistance from a cane. Neither vulnerability was subtle or hidden. Both were obvious…and both were ignored.

Ironically, the most dangerous moment for immigration detainees may not be detention (although it is impossible to ignore the fact that at least 32 people died in 2025 alone while in ICE detention), it may be release. Immigration lawyers and advocacy groups have long warned about a phenomenon called “release and disappear”: when a detainee is processed out of federal custody and they may (or may not) be given paperwork and instructions for a future immigration hearing. But they are left with no transportation and no assistance. In some cases, they have no structured transition back into the community, especially if they have no family or support system waiting for them. In other words, they are “free”, but effectively stranded. So they end up disappearing.

And when vulnerable people are released this way, the consequences are especially easy to predict: disorientation, exposure, medical crises, and sometimes death. Like the deaths of Daphy and Nurul.

An important sidenote: Daphy Michel’s death is also unfolding against the backdrop of a major legal battle affecting hundreds of thousands of Haitians in the United States. For years, many Haitian immigrants have lived in the United States under Temporary Protected Status (TPS), a humanitarian program allowing people from countries facing war, natural disasters, or other extraordinary crises to live and work legally in the United States.

The program was originally granted to Haitians after the devastating 2010 earthquake and has been repeatedly extended as Haiti’s political collapse and gang violence intensified. But in 2025, the Trump Regime attempted to terminate Haiti’s TPS designation, a decision that would strip legal protections from roughly 350,000 Haitian immigrants living here.

Multiple lawsuits quickly followed. In February of 2026, a federal judge blocked the termination, allowing Haitian TPS holders to remain in the country while the litigation continues. Shortly thereafter, a federal appeals court upheld that ruling, concluding that ending TPS could have “devastating” consequences and potentially return people to a country engulfed in violence and political instability. The Trump Regime has, of course, now asked SCOTUS to allow the termination to proceed, escalating what has become one of the most consequential immigration cases in years.

This legal fight underscores a stark reality: Haitian immigrants like Daphy Michel are already living under extraordinary instability. And yet the federal immigration system tasked with managing that reality appears incapable of providing even the most basic protections for people in its custody.

A Haitian asylum seeker with mental health vulnerabilities released alone in Pittsburgh. A nearly blind Rohingya refugee dropped off at a coffee shop in Buffalo. Both dead within days after being released from federal immigration custody. Both dead after the government failed to ensure a safe transition back into the community.

If a hospital discharged a confused patient into the street, we would call it malpractice. If a prison released a mentally ill inmate into freezing weather without supervision, we would call it negligence. But when immigration authorities do it? The Trump Regime calls it “enforcement.”